Volume 5, Issue 1, March 2020, Page: 6-12
Smallholder Tobacco Farmers and Forest Conservation in Mutasa District, Zimbabwe
Mango Lawrence, Department of Agricultural Management, Zimbabwe Open University, Bindura, Zimbabwe
Kugedera Andrew Tapiwa, Department of Livestock, Wildlife and Fisheries, Great Zimbabwe University, Masvingo, Zimbabwe
Mango Lovemore, Department of Sciences, Magunje High School, Murewa, Zimbabwe
Mutenje Michael, Department of Agriculture, Hilcrest College, Mutare, Zimbabwe
Received: Nov. 21, 2019;       Accepted: Dec. 12, 2019;       Published: Feb. 14, 2020
DOI: 10.11648/j.eeb.20200501.12      View  442      Downloads  91
Abstract
Zimbabwe is among the poorest countries in the world and heavily depends on agriculture for rural livelihoods and income generation. Forests conversion into agricultural land and the use of forest products, in particular fuel wood for the construction of tobacco barns and the curing process has caused destruction to the already depleted forests. The study was carried out in Mutasa District in the eastern highlands, Zimbabwe. Quantitative and qualitative data techniques were used in the study. A total of 60 smallholder tobacco farmers were purposively sampled from a population of 280 tobacco producing households for the survey. The data was collected using a structured questionnaire and direct observations. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics and Binary logistic. Results show that proximity to the forest (p < 0.001), age of farmer (p = 0.001), agricultural training (p = 0.028) and unavailability of electricity (p = 0.028) were significantly influencing the conservation of miombo woodlands. In the contrary; household size (p = 0.983), level of education (p = 0.525), gender (p = 0.113), unavailability of coal (p = 0.109) and culture (p = 0.078) showed no significant difference in the conservation of miombo woodlands. It is recommended that the government embark on a more vigorous approach in the supply of energy for the curing of tobacco and conserving the existing forests to mitigate effects of deforestation and climate change. Most importantly, smallholder farmers should be educated to use other alternative sources of fuel to promote the regeneration of the already injured woodlands. All stakeholders should be involved in planning and decision making on issues related to forest conservation and technology in tobacco production.
Keywords
Deforestation, Forest Conservation, Fuel Wood, Miombo Woodlands, Smallholder Farmers, Tobacco Production
To cite this article
Mango Lawrence, Kugedera Andrew Tapiwa, Mango Lovemore, Mutenje Michael, Smallholder Tobacco Farmers and Forest Conservation in Mutasa District, Zimbabwe, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. Vol. 5, No. 1, 2020, pp. 6-12. doi: 10.11648/j.eeb.20200501.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Abdel, A and Kobbail, R. Local people’s attitude towards community forestry practices: a case study of Kosti province-central Sudan. International journal of forestry research, 2012, pp. 7.
[2]
Adhikari, B. Household characteristics on common property resource management. A model for households dependency on local commons. 2002, Environment Department the University of York Heslington, York Y010 5dd, United Kingdom.
[3]
Adhikari, B. Di Falco, S. Lovett, J. C. Household Characteristics and Forest Dependency: Evidence from common property forest management in Nepal. Ecologial Economics. 2004, 48: 245-257.
[4]
Agrawal, B. Gender and forest conservation: the impact of women participation in community forest governance. Ecological economics. 2009, 68 (11); 2785-2799.
[5]
Araki, H. and Schmid, C. Is hatchery stocking a help or harm? Evidence, limitations and future directions in ecological and genetic surveys. Aquaculture. 2010, 308: S2–S11.
[6]
Benhin, J. K. A. Agriculture and Deforestation in the Tropics: A critical theoretical and empirical review, Royal Swedish Academy of sciences, Ambio. 2006, 35 (1).
[7]
Beyene A. D. Forest dependency property rights and local level institutions: Brancher L., Florax R. Vermaat J. The Empirics of Wetland Valuation. 2011: A Comprehensive Summary and a Meta-Analysis of the Literature. Envinen Resour. Econ. 2006, 33: 223-250.
[8]
Boedhihartono, A. K. Can Community Forests Be Compatible With Biodiversity Conservation in Indonesia? Land, 2017, 6 (21).
[9]
Buyinza, M. and Naguula, A. Adoption of Agroforestry technology and land conservation strategies in the highlands of South-Western Uganda. Makerere University. Res. J. 2007, (21): 13-24.
[10]
Chipika, J., and Kowero, G. Deforestation of woodlands in communal areas of Zimbabwe: Is it due to agricultural policies? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2000, 79 (2-3): 175-185.
[11]
Chivuraise, C. The Economics of Smallholder Tobacco Production and Implications of Tobacco Growing on Deforestation in Hurungwe District of Zimbabwe. Masters Thesis, University of Zimbabwe. 2011, Harare, Zimbabwe.
[12]
FAO. Forest Genetic Resources No. 30. Edited by Palmberg-Lerche, C., Iversen, P. A., Sigaud, P., FAO 2002.
[13]
FAO. Forest resource assessment, FAO forestry paper 140, Rome. 2008, Available at www.fao.org/forestry/site/fra/en.
[14]
FAO. FAO statistics online. 2010.
[15]
FAO. Forests and energy in developing countries: Forests and energy working paper 2 STCP Engenharia de Projetos Ltda. Curitiba, Brazil. 2007.
[16]
FAO. State of the World Forest. Cooperate Document Repository, Rome, Italy, 2011.
[17]
Fraiser, A. I. The use of wood by the tobacco industry in Brazil. International forest Science Consultancy, Edinburrgh, 1986, pp. 35.
[18]
Geist, H. J. How tobacco farming contributes to Tropical deforestation. In: Adedian, et al eds. The economics of tobacco control: Towards an optimal policy mix, Applied Fiscal Research Centre. 1998, Cape Town, South Africa.
[19]
Geist, H. J. Global assessment of deforestation related to tobacco farming. Tobacco control. 1999, 8: 18-28.
[20]
Guthiga, P. Understanding local communities perceptions of existing forest management regimes of a Kenyan rainforest. International journal of social forestry (IJSF). 2008, 1 (2): 145-166.
[21]
Harrison, P. Socio-Economic study of forest-Adjacent communities from Nyanganje forest to Udzungwa Scarp: A potential Wildlife Corridor. WWW Tanzania Programme office Dov es Salaam, Tanzania. 2006, http://www.ddinternational.org.uk.
[22]
Jagger, P. Luckert, M. M. K. Duchelle, A. E. Lund, J. F. Sunderlin, W. D. Tenure and forest income: Observations from a global study on forests and poverty. World Development. 2014, 64: S43-S55.
[23]
Katsvanga, C. A. T. Mukwewa, O. Mupangwa, J. M. and Buzuzi, G. Land Use Impacts on Miombo Woodland Species in Wenimbi Resettlement Area of Macheke, 2008, Zimbabwe. http://www.jsd-africa.com/Jsda.
[24]
Kimani, J. N. Sustainable forest management and enforcement strategies in Kenya. Kenya forest service. 2010, Nairobi, Kenya.
[25]
Kiplangat, A. Mburu, J. Mugendi, D. and Rietdorf, U. What influences household demand for non-timber forest products? Linking econometric and participatory methods in Kakamega forest, 2010, Kenya. Hamburg.
[26]
Kugonza, A. Buyinza, M. and Byakigaba, P. Linking local community livelihoods and forest conservation in Masindi district north western Uganda. Research Journal of applied sciences. 2009, 4 (1): 10-16.
[27]
Laurance, W. F. Sayer, J. and Cassman, K. G. Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2014, 29 (2).
[28]
Lindahl, T. Bodin, Ö. Tengö, M. Governing complex commons: The role of communication for experimental learning and coordinated management. Ecological Economics, 2015, 111: 111-120.
[29]
Mutenje, M. and Mango, L. Impact of tobacco production on indigenous forest trees: A case of Mutasa district, Zimbabwe, Journal of Forestry and Plantation. 2019, 1 (1): 1-7.
[30]
Manyanhaire, I. O. and Kurangwa, W. Estimation of the impact of tobacco curing on wood resources in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 2014, 3 (7): 1455–1467.
[31]
Mapedza, E. Forestry policy in colonial and postcolonial Zimbabwe: continuity and change, Journal of Historical Geography, 2007, 33 (4): 833-851.
[32]
Mehta, J. and Heinen, J. Does community base conservation shape favourable attitudes among locals? An empirical study of Nepal Environmental management. 2001, 28: 165-177.
[33]
Munanga, W. Kufazvinei, C. Mugabe, F. Svotwa, E. Evaluation of the Curing Efficiency of the Rocket Barn in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research. 2014, 3 (2): 436-441.
[34]
Nautiyal, S. and Kaechele, H. A modelling approach for natural resource management in nature protection areas of Indian Himalayan region. Management of Environmental Quality. 2008, 19 (3): doi: 10.1108/14777830810866455.
[35]
Nayak, N. S. Tobacco Curing and Fuel Efficiency in Karnataka, India: South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics (SANDEE) working paper No. 77-13. 2013, P. O Box 8975, EPC 1056, Kathmandu, Nepal. Available at: www.sandeeonline.org.
[36]
Njana, M. A. Kajembe, G. C. Malimbwi, R. E. Are miombo woodlands vital to livelihoods of rural households? Evidence from Urumwa and surrounding communities, Tabora, Tanzania. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods. 2013, 22 (2): 124-140.
[37]
Ozturk, A. Saglam, B. and Barli, O. Attitudes and perceptions of rural people towards forest protection within the scope of participatory forest management: A case study from Artvin, Turkey. 2010.
[38]
Pearce, D. and Brown, K. Saving the world tropical forests, in Brown and Pearce (Eds). The causes of tropical deforestation. The economics and statistical analysis of factors giving rise to the loss of the tropical forest. 1994, pp. 2-26. UCL Press.
[39]
Rocheleau, D, and Edmunds, D. Women, Men and Trees: Gender, Power and Property in Forest and Agrarian Landscapes. World Development. 1997, 25 (8): 1351-71.
[40]
Sapkota, I. P. and Oden, P. C. Household characteristics and dependency on community forests in Terai of Nepal. International Journal of social forestry (IJSF), 2008, 1 (2).
[41]
Sayer, J. and Margules, C. Biodiversity in Locally Managed Lands. Land, 2017, 6 (41).
[42]
Semwal, R. L. Nautiyal, S. Sen, K. K. Rana, U. Maikhuri, R. K. and Rao, K. S. Patterns and ecological implications of agricultural land-use changes: a case study from Central Himalaya, India. Agricultural Ecosystem and Environment journal. 2004, 102: 81-92.
[43]
Shackleton, S. Paumgarten, F. Kassa, H. Husselman, M. and Zida, M. Opportunities for Enhancing Poor Women’s Socioeconomic Empowerment in the Value Chains of Three African Non- Timber Forest Products (NTFPS). International Forestry Review Commonwealth Forestry Association. 2011, pp. 136-151.
[44]
Shumba, E. M. Biodiversity and Planning Support Programme: Zimbabwe: Case Study Paper prepared for an international workshop on "Integration of Biodiversity in National Forestry Planning Programme", CIFOR Headquarters, Bogor, Indonesia on 13-16 August 2001.
[45]
Sumati, V. Examining the socioeconomic drivers of fuel wood dependence in villages on the Northern boundary of Bandipur national park. (MSc thesis). Manipur academy of higher education. 2006.
[46]
Sunderlin, W. Angelson, A. Belcher, B. Burgers, P. Nasi, R. Santoso, L. and Wunder, S. Livelihoods, forests and conservation in developing countries: An overview. World Development. 2005, 33 (9): 1383–1402, Elsevier, UK.
[47]
Thorai, T. and Ranola, R. Decision making by upland farmers on forest management in the North West Mountainous region of Vietnam. JISSAAS. 2010, 16 (1): 68-82.
[48]
Tobacco Industry and Marketing Board (TIMB). Annual Statistical Report, P. O Box 10214 Harare, Zimbabwe. 2018.
[49]
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Consumption and Production: Priority Products and Materials. 2010.
Browse journals by subject